blog etudes-augias

We spoke on about Lib-Lab as ideology of our age and on about third industrial revolution as sole and inevitable structural reform of our economy.
Now we must constate that Lib-Lab is the sole basis od third industrial revolution. Without such a ideology, this revolution would be not possible. Ideology and revolution are the beginning of a new way of life for entire humanity.
Consequently oppositions are and shall be strong and it shall be necessary a democratic army similar to that of Kemal Ataturk.
Real opposition to lib-lab and to industrial revolution are corruption and all powers often not visible that they create. To all levels, particularly to that hight.
It is not a case that I spoke of multinational States as the atlantic empire by anglo american leader of mediterranean Europe by french leader.
Other asiatic countries shall follow as well as Inde and China in their own interest.

In our age the State is the only real and concrete interlocutor of workers. The State must project the big works. For example ,m the high speed from Lisbon to Vladivostok.
At such a point the State cannot be a national State. Italian State would have a sense ? At minimum we should speak of Europe , if it exist. Or of anglo\american empire, which exists. With all their associated of all continents., A thing is sure. Globalisation needs of big directional centres against in utility of local powers. Multinational State couldn’t accept any obstacle.

News bulletins of Switzerland communicated that this Country ,sole case in the world, realized near full employment . Consequently it can to begin the talk on economy that, as a matter of fact, can begin only from full employment. Without full employment a talk on economy cannot have a sense.
In the past time capitalism controlled the unemployment in order to maintain low the wages. Today this behaviour should be criminal. Consequently full employment isn’t only an economic fact but also a moral fact. In fact new technologies increased needs of goods and services at point that it is possible work, as already said, for at least fifty years. Also funds would be guaranteed. Please think to fiscal shield and to washes of public administrations. Some time ego local administrations were gratis because title of prestige like at the time of Greeks and Romans. Today there is a rush for the salary from side of men idlers that have neither art nor part. Trial is degradation of villages and towns.
Level of unemployment is now a real crime against humanity and a serious Parliament should legislate.

During the time of industrial army employer was only interlocutor of workers, usually in conflicts with these. Class struggle at the shadow of two opposite ideologies: socialism and liberalism.
Technological revolution of our age, not only still alive but with unexpected developments, transformed and keeps transforming the old social order. Industrials hosts don’t exist anymore and surviving battalions are much reduced. It is the birth of various forms of independent word or of little groups. Big companies of transports and of energy shall be obliged at forms of cooperation up to inevitably forms of association.
The State, as only responsible of work program and only financer of economic structures of base, shall be interlocutor of these new worker.
Inside this programs there will be surely the private initiative. Socialism and liberalism shall laws their connotation of the nineteenth century. Not only they shall not in conflict but at contrary they shall be interdependent like History and Moral in the new new humanistic culture. Liberal-socialism becomes as a matter of fact, the ideology of our age without contraposition of another ideology. The real obliged opposition shall be tax evasion, corruption, organised crime, terrorism, religious and racist fanaticism and also nationalism and local nationalism today not only absurd but ridiculous in the global war.
Before to enter in all such problems, I can advance that Italy has three million of out of work but, at the same time, it could have fifty years of sure work and also money to finance.
To this purpose several blogs shall follow.

English rage obliged Europe to make its first politic act really as European Union. *It damned without appeal the terrorist of Teheran and his boss Kameney.
We hope that such an act has a continuation due to France and Germany have immediately approved English rage making in the fact about an hypothesis of a Directory like lead of entire Union.
Verum ipsum factum, one makes things making them, and this hypothesis would constitute the concrete beginning of a finally politic Europe.
Unfortunately this is only an hypothesis and not a fact. Transition by hypothesis to a fact implicates intelligence.

The ideology of our age ,expressed by new humanism and that is perfectly suitable to global world, is only one.
The positivist world produced principally two ideologies that, one against the other, were the basis of historical dialectic: liberal and socialist ideologies.
Our global world verified that liberalism without rules was savage and denied itself, i.e. was a liberalism without freedom. It verified also that socialism, what produced social progress, results now not sufficient. It is a matter of fact.
Social conquests and structural interventions of the State stay embalmed, unusables, if they are not accompanied by those infinite individual initiatives that progress of technologies produced in a society now not only agricultural and industrial, but principally of services.
Technologies reduced agricultural and industrial wor4kers and created an infinite number of new jobs.
The liberal-socialism so results to be the sole ideology suitable with new humanism, with our age, with global world.
What, consequently, could be opposed to this ideology due to History’s basis is a dialectic that repeat itself without end?
Opposition is represented by negation of this ideology, that Sartre called alienation of freedom. And there will be many negations because “il y a les hommes sauvès et les hommes de l’Enfer”. And “les homes de l’Enfer”, that don’t accept freedom and justice but want only privileges and power, always will exist because their arrogance is part of their nature.
The real historical conflict is a moral conflict because Moral,Sartre said, is interdependent with History.
In any case , in the long run, , arrogance always shall be beaten.

I would be ridiculous if I pretend to teach democracy to French and English citizens. At contrary Italian men, who felt freedom’s desperation, have the duty to build democracy in Italy. In fact dictatorships more or less masked, devastated Italy for about a century. A graffito of ’68 said :” It shall die in the ridiculous and a laugh shall bury it”.
All can to begin narrating the subjective real life of characters who felt in this Country freedom’s desperation.
The subjective real life is basis and origin of History. Individual freedom, discovered by desperation, leads to democracy.
At contrary France and England will continue to give hospitality to Italian politic exiles. In Italy there is, perhaps, some French or English politic exile?

When I hear Bossi and Berlusconi to speak of freedom, this makes me laugh. If, at contrary, I hear Ugo Ciappina, robber and martyr, to speak of freedom, I understand and feel what freedom is. Because I understand and feel desperation that such a man lived and suffered. Because only desperation reveals freedom. In fact I called “desperate of freedom” characters of my works because only with their desperation they divulgate on over all the world the idea of freedom, their desperate freedom.

I already wrote elsewhere that I called “freedom’s desperates” the characters who distinguish themselves in my literary, historical, poetic and narrative books and others who succeeded to distinguish themselves during my life and whose I was witness.
Sartre speaks of anxiety and also of “nausea” face to unauthenticity . I felt desperation face to freedom lost or that I was to lose it. So I saw and suffered it in others who I met and whose I was witness. This is the sense that I give to freedom. Somebody gives his own. But all meet the same unsuppressible state of mind. Freedom’s sense is over life and death that are nothing without the freedom. Like two riders of Hegel, one beaten and the other winner. “Do you wish to be a live in slavery or to die in freedom?” Usually the bitten man chose to die. But free.

Paraphrasing conclusion of “Nadja” of Breton ( “Beauty shall be convulsive or shall not be”) we can to say that Europe shall be atlantic or not shall be. Practically, in the actual situation, the sole Europe of today is UK with States and parties which follow it in its atlantic policy at the point to consider english-american the american Empire. Continental Europe which could have a noble point of departure like reconciliation franco-german , at contrary it is inactive. During celebration of fiftieth anniversary of Pacts of Rome it was lacking only Requiem Mass of Verdi. At contrary of what one says , it don’t exist no union either monetary or mercantile. each Country has a buy-power different from that of other Countries . The ratio dollar-euro is eccentric. Dollar quotes 30% less than Euro but its buy- power in America is three times higher than Euro. All economists are silent. Requiem Mass also for them. It is vain to speak of health, pensions, schools etc… Sarkozy promised atlantic policy. After that it is possible harmonize the different interior policies. Atlantic policy should be an act of wisdom. It needs don’t forget that from 11 Sept. 2001 we are living a new worldly war , more insidious and difficult than those previous. What Europe could do without american cover?